Border Agreement with China

Sino-Indian border: why tensions between neighbors are rising By deviating from the previous position of decoupling the border from other aspects of bilateral relations, New Delhi has now made bilateral relations with China dependent on border stability. In a speech in March 2021, Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar said of the future of India-China relations: “If you want to see progress, I need peace and tranquility at the border. I can`t have tension at the border. I can`t have the kind of problems I had in Galwan and then say, well, you know, let`s move on in the rest of our relationship. It`s unreal. The clashes between Nathu La and Cho La were a series of military clashes in 1967 between India and China along the border of the Himalayan kingdom of Sikkim, then an Indian protectorate. After the end of the conflicts, the Chinese army withdrew from Sikkim. Despite trust mechanisms and agreements such as the BDCA, border disputes have not only become more frequent and larger, but also more protracted and more difficult to resolve. Chinese border brands, including one from the newly created Republic of China, were near Walong until January 1914, when T. O`Callaghan, a deputy administrator of the eastern sector of the Northeast Border Agency (NEFA), moved it north to locations closer to the McMahon Line (although still south of the line). He then traveled to Rima, met with Tibetan officials and saw no Chinese influence in the area. [20] Signed in New Delhi on 29 November 1996, available in the Chinese AMF contract database in English, Chinese and Hindi.

Copies and summaries in English of the agreement are also available in the United Nations Peacemakers Database and the University of Edinburgh`s PA-X Peace Agreement Database. According to the UN Peacemaker website, the agreement “allows for military disclosure when the parties conduct border exercises and the reduction of troop levels in border areas. It also allows parties to observe and inspect troop movements in their respective territories by invitation. In this agreement, both sides agreed to reduce or limit their forces in the mutually agreed geographical areas along the LAC. It defines the main categories of armament to be reduced or limited: “Battle tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, guns (including howitzers) of a caliber of 75 mm or more, mortars of a caliber of 120 mm or more, surface-to-surface missiles, surface-to-air missiles and any other jointly agreed weapons system.” (Art. 3.) It also stipulates that “both parties must open fire, cause biodegradation, use dangerous chemicals, carry out explosive actions or hunt with weapons or explosives within a radius of two kilometers from the line of actual control.” (Art. 6.) India and China have signed a series of agreements aimed at resolving tensions along the Line of Effective Control (LAC), the de facto border between the two countries. But the current impasse has already lasted eighteen months – indicating that current controls may not be enough.

3 Prabkash, K Dutta, “How China Aksai Conquered China,” India Today, June 22, 2020. Retrieved August 30, 2020 from www.indiatoday.in/india/story/how-china-captured-aksai-chin-1691562-2020-06-22. Dutta writes: “Five years before the start of the Indochinese war, a Chinese newspaper, Kuang-ming Jih-pao, reported on October 6, 1957: `Sinkiang-Tibet – the world`s highest highway – has been completed.` Signed in Beijing on 7 September 1993, available in the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) contract database in English, Chinese and Hindi. All three texts have the same validity. A copy in English is also available in the UN PEACEmaker database. According to a summary on the UN Peacemaker website, this agreement provides the “framework for border security between the parties until the final decision on demarcation is made.” The parties agree to “keep the armed forces to a minimum in the areas along the Line of Effective Control” and to “reduce the number of troops” compatible with friendly and good relations between them. (Art. 2.) They also agree to implement confidence-building measures along the control of LAC, including through prior notification of “military exercises at a certain level close to the line of effective control authorized by this Agreement”.

(Art. 2.) The allegations, if true, would be the first time in 45 years that shots have been fired at the border. A 1996 agreement banned the use of weapons and explosives near the border – to avoid a confrontation that would spiral out of control. The interpretation of lac in each country is based on the amount of territory that it believes can be controlled militarily or governed by patrols. This means that each side can change its interpretation of the LAC by simply improving its military position along the border. The ambiguity of the LAC itself contributes to increased tensions at the borders. The Indian position, as explained by Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, was that Aksai Chin had been “part of the Ladakh region of India for centuries” and that this northern border was a “fixed and definitive border that could not be discussed with anyone”. [13] It was reported that the June 15 border conflict took place during an apparent “de-escalation process,” a few weeks after “senior military commanders of both countries” on June 6. June had agreed to “peacefully resolve the situation in the border areas in accordance with various bilateral agreements.” The clash on the ridge reportedly involved close combat with iron bars, stones and fists, resulting in the deaths of 20 Indian soldiers and an unknown number of Chinese soldiers. While neither side carried weapons, most of the soldiers killed in the fighting lost their grip or were pushed back from the narrow Himalayan ridge and plunged to their deaths. These are the first deaths along the LAC since 1975. The Chinese military has an Integrated Western Theater Command (WTC) throughout the ALC with India.

The Western Theater Command also covers the provinces of Sichuan, Gansu, Ningxia, Qinghai, and Chongqing. China has 5 integrated theater commandos. [73] “Ultimately, the dynamic between India and China will play an important role in how Bhutan seeks to establish diplomatic relations with Beijing,” Joshi stressed. The Johnson Line is not used west of the Karakoram Pass, where China borders Pakistan-administered Gilgit-Baltistan. On October 13, 1962, China and Pakistan began negotiations across the border west of the Karakoram Pass. In 1963, the two countries set their borders largely on the basis of the Macartney-MacDonald Line, which left the Trans Karakoram 5,800 km2 (2,200 square miles) / 5,180 km2 (2,000 square miles) in China, although the agreement provided for renegotiation in the event of a settlement of the Kashmir conflict. .

Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.